Ethics and Moral Reasoning Essay -- Morality/Ethics

Aristotles Virtue EthicsAristotle in his sexual morality ethics states that a virtuous soul is some hotshot with ideal traits. These characteristic traits normally abide by from an individuals innate drift but should be cultivated. later they ar cultivated, these character traits supposedly become stable in an individual. honorable consequentilaists and deontologists are normally concerned with universal doctrines that can be utilised in any situation that requires moral interpretation. Unlike these theorists, Aristotles virtue ethics are concerned with the general questions such as what is a fair life, what are proper social and family values, and how should cardinal live (Bejczy 32). Aristotle developed his virtue ethics based on trey central principles eudaimonia, ethics of care, and agent based theories. Eudaimonia stipulates that virtues can be seen in the way an individual flourishes flourishing under this concept refers to ones ability to perform their percentages with distinct accuracy (Bejczy 33).The distinct function of humans according to Aristotle is reasoning, and a worthy life is characterized by good reasoning. The agent based theory places emphasis on the fact that virtues are determined by common institutions people use to label traits in other people as admirable. According to Aristotles virtue ethics, a virtue like sincerey does not necessarily refer to the tendency of people acting honestly, or the classification of the virtue as a desirable trait. Instead, Aristotle purports that the virtue of honesty is predisposed and entrenched in an individual (Bejczy 34). In virtue ethics, therefore, an individual cannot be labeled as honest since he is not cheating, or by observant the honesty in ones dealings. In addi... ... the majority, rights become the greatest good (Troyer 60). goalAristotles virtue ethics argue that morality should be based on an individuals ideal traits that are internalized as opposed to observing outward exert ions or the consequence of his/her behavior. Kant on the contrary argues that for an individual to be considered morally upright, then his/her actions should be based on duty. Mills maintains that if an action provides long-term pleasures to the majority, then it is morally upright.Works CitedBejczy, Istvan. Virtue ethics in the middle Ages Commentaries on Aristotles Nicomachean Ethics, 1200 - 1500. Leiden Brill, 2008. Print.Troyer, John. The Classical Utilitarians Bentham and Mill. Indianapolis Hackett Publishers, 2003. Print.Wike, Victoria S. Kant on Happiness in Ethics. Albany Albany State University Press, 1994. Print.